Audio HQ Car audio, regular music, anything audio should goes in this forum.

8" quarter wave (transmission line) box

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-05-2007 | 04:18 PM
  #21 (permalink)  
jseville88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default t- line box

so when building a t-line enclosure you dont have to calculate for space that the woofer needs you just build it to the size of the line and thats it?
Old 12-06-2007 | 03:55 AM
  #22 (permalink)  
Skee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,027
Likes: 0
Default

ya thats about it port area/ length and drop some 45 degree angle it will give ya another 1.5db or so nothing noticeable unless you have a meter.
__________________
Custom high amp Alternators.. pm me
Old 12-06-2007 | 05:36 AM
  #23 (permalink)  
Notladstyle's Avatar
King of Ricers
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,330
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jseville88
i'm having some trouble understanding how this enclosure actually works.For whatever reason it doesn't make sense to me.If your enclosure is 31.5x9x18 that's only about 2.20 ft3 if your line or port is 37.5 sq inches and 106 inches long then the displacement of the port would be greater than the amount of space actually in the enclosure.
From what I understand, the point is to bring the backwave of the output from the subwoofer into sync with the front wave(so that the net output is positive and both negative at the same times).

In order to achieve that, the port is the exact length that sound at the fs frequency of the subwoofer would travel in one cycle of the subwoofer. The area of the port has to be the same area displaced by the subwoofer because friction will slow air and and put the back wave out of sync.

I guess =/ Sounds very inefficient because it only works at the fs.
__________________
notladstyle.blogspot.com



Old 12-06-2007 | 07:57 AM
  #24 (permalink)  
TBSpyder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,104
Likes: 0
Default

Holy shit, welcome to last year!
__________________
I got a dig bick. You this read wrong. You read that wrong too.
Old 12-06-2007 | 08:42 AM
  #25 (permalink)  
TJElite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NoTLaDStyle
From what I understand, the point is to bring the backwave of the output from the subwoofer into sync with the front wave(so that the net output is positive and both negative at the same times).

In order to achieve that, the port is the exact length that sound at the fs frequency of the subwoofer would travel in one cycle of the subwoofer. The area of the port has to be the same area displaced by the subwoofer because friction will slow air and and put the back wave out of sync.

I guess =/ Sounds very inefficient because it only works at the fs.
Basically correct. The length is actually 1/4 of the wavelength at Fs. I'm pretty sure it could also be other multiples, but length would be prohibitive.

It is not ineffcient, however. While it is tuned at Fs, it is like any other port, in that it 'hangs over' each end...i.e., the Fs is the top of the hump, but there is still improved output on each side. Typically, it will cover one octave up, and one down. Similar to a ported box tuned to Fs.

And, just like any other ported box, the woofer still plays all the frequencies that it is given...it doesn't magically shut off...output is just maximized at Fs. They are not only very efficient , but they are extremely accurate as well. Some say it is the ultimate setup for sq.

Per my original post, we got 133 db on a simple 8, with about 300 watts, on music. Later, in the same enclosure, we got to about 137 with a treo 8 on 500 watts. Some of you heard it at the last meet...I don't think inefficient is a good descriptor

I have a bandpass Tline (you do this when the Qts of the woofer is a little high for straight Tline) as a center console in my Ultimate Tailgating Suburban, if any of you want to hear it at the meet Saturday. That's also the vehicle that has the tactile transducers in it.

Toby
__________________
Toby Johnson

BlackDog Racing
BlackDog Speed Shop

Lincolnshire, IL



Last edited by TJElite; 12-06-2007 at 08:44 AM.
Old 12-06-2007 | 08:44 AM
  #26 (permalink)  
TJElite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TBSpyder
Holy shit, welcome to last year!

Yeah, but at least it was an intellegent excavation, instead of something like

'I got a 8 4 sale it slams ht me up'

Toby
__________________
Toby Johnson

BlackDog Racing
BlackDog Speed Shop

Lincolnshire, IL


Old 12-06-2007 | 09:18 AM
  #27 (permalink)  
Notladstyle's Avatar
King of Ricers
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,330
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TBSpyder
Holy shit, welcome to last year!
Holy shit, welcome back to the forum
__________________
notladstyle.blogspot.com



Old 12-06-2007 | 09:21 AM
  #28 (permalink)  
Notladstyle's Avatar
King of Ricers
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,330
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TJElite
Basically correct. The length is actually 1/4 of the wavelength at Fs. I'm pretty sure it could also be other multiples, but length would be prohibitive.

It is not ineffcient, however. While it is tuned at Fs, it is like any other port, in that it 'hangs over' each end...i.e., the Fs is the top of the hump, but there is still improved output on each side. Typically, it will cover one octave up, and one down. Similar to a ported box tuned to Fs.

And, just like any other ported box, the woofer still plays all the frequencies that it is given...it doesn't magically shut off...output is just maximized at Fs. They are not only very efficient , but they are extremely accurate as well. Some say it is the ultimate setup for sq.

Per my original post, we got 133 db on a simple 8, with about 300 watts, on music. Later, in the same enclosure, we got to about 137 with a treo 8 on 500 watts. Some of you heard it at the last meet...I don't think inefficient is a good descriptor

I have a bandpass Tline (you do this when the Qts of the woofer is a little high for straight Tline) as a center console in my Ultimate Tailgating Suburban, if any of you want to hear it at the meet Saturday. That's also the vehicle that has the tactile transducers in it.

Toby
Efficient at the tuning freq, but what would a 30-200hz graph look like?

... Wait, cant your meter produce such a graph?
__________________
notladstyle.blogspot.com



Old 12-06-2007 | 11:06 AM
  #29 (permalink)  
TJElite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NoTLaDStyle
Efficient at the tuning freq, but what would a 30-200hz graph look like?

... Wait, cant your meter produce such a graph?
I'd have to guess that it would look like a ported box, tuned to the Fs. Probably a large ported box.

Actually, it would probably look more like the woofer response curve, with a hump at FS. Like I said, this is not some sort of bandpass, that filters the response.

Since I typically don't run subs above 63hz (sometimes not above 50), I don't care what it would look like up to 200. If I use a woofer with Fs of 30, I can expect peak response to be from 15 to 60, which is about perfect in a car.

I don't know well Termpro would actually graph. It does have the little bar graph below the SPL, which will show where the peak SPL occured. I guess if we fed the woofer pink noise, it would draw some sort of graph. If not, I also have an RTA package that definitely would.

Unfortunately, the only Tline I currently have is in a convertible (more like a converted, since it has no top) Suburban...not the best for accurate readings.

Toby
__________________
Toby Johnson

BlackDog Racing
BlackDog Speed Shop

Lincolnshire, IL






All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 AM.