2011 Mustang 5.0 or 2011 Camaro SS1?
Porno Music Producer
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,521
Likes: 0
^ If this was the same Ford from pre 05, I would say this could be a fluke model. Ford has really stepped up their game lately and they have been cranking out some good stuff... Skip any Ford except new ones and then pre 1980ish.
car with tiny wheels
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Well i see this site is still good for a laugh every once in a while. Comparing the 3 valve 4.6 to the ls3 is a joke. If you believe that then i guess you would think the ls9 is equal to the 5.0? hahaha. Also posting about camaro's running mid 13's stock but the new mustang's running low 12's stock... that is another misconception. Funny thing is i saw 3 different stock 5.0 mustangs all running low 13's at the track. Yes on the internet you can read about this and that but that is what i have seen so far first hand. Keep in mind to some people stock means an intake/tune/drag radials, stock to me means delivered that way from the factory. As posted earlier when my SS was bone stock it went 13.1 at 109mph multiple times, those are average real world results. I do agree that for 1/4 mile track performance the new mustang is a better platform and it is already lighter but for an all around car i picked the camaro.
__________________
in memory of Kevin Gonzalez 6/21/86 - 9/13/06
in memory of Kevin Gonzalez 6/21/86 - 9/13/06
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,049
Likes: 0
Well i see this site is still good for a laugh every once in a while. Comparing the 3 valve 4.6 to the ls3 is a joke. If you believe that then i guess you would think the ls9 is equal to the 5.0? hahaha. Also posting about camaro's running mid 13's stock but the new mustang's running low 12's stock... that is another misconception. Funny thing is i saw 3 different stock 5.0 mustangs all running low 13's at the track. Yes on the internet you can read about this and that but that is what i have seen so far first hand. Keep in mind to some people stock means an intake/tune/drag radials, stock to me means delivered that way from the factory. As posted earlier when my SS was bone stock it went 13.1 at 109mph multiple times, those are average real world results. I do agree that for 1/4 mile track performance the new mustang is a better platform and it is already lighter but for an all around car i picked the camaro.
__________________
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Well i see this site is still good for a laugh every once in a while. Comparing the 3 valve 4.6 to the ls3 is a joke. If you believe that then i guess you would think the ls9 is equal to the 5.0? hahaha. Also posting about camaro's running mid 13's stock but the new mustang's running low 12's stock... that is another misconception. Funny thing is i saw 3 different stock 5.0 mustangs all running low 13's at the track. Yes on the internet you can read about this and that but that is what i have seen so far first hand. Keep in mind to some people stock means an intake/tune/drag radials, stock to me means delivered that way from the factory. As posted earlier when my SS was bone stock it went 13.1 at 109mph multiple times, those are average real world results. I do agree that for 1/4 mile track performance the new mustang is a better platform and it is already lighter but for an all around car i picked the camaro.
Mark G
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,192
Likes: 0
The new 5.0 mustang gets down but it still looks like the 4.6 which dosn't really do it for me at the price. I guess I still need to see one with the correct stance/wheels.
I like how the camaros look and they're almost just as quick. They're within bolt-on's apart from eachother anyway
I like how the camaros look and they're almost just as quick. They're within bolt-on's apart from eachother anyway
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
Well i see this site is still good for a laugh every once in a while. Comparing the 3 valve 4.6 to the ls3 is a joke. If you believe that then i guess you would think the ls9 is equal to the 5.0? hahaha. Also posting about camaro's running mid 13's stock but the new mustang's running low 12's stock... that is another misconception. Funny thing is i saw 3 different stock 5.0 mustangs all running low 13's at the track. Yes on the internet you can read about this and that but that is what i have seen so far first hand. Keep in mind to some people stock means an intake/tune/drag radials, stock to me means delivered that way from the factory. As posted earlier when my SS was bone stock it went 13.1 at 109mph multiple times, those are average real world results. I do agree that for 1/4 mile track performance the new mustang is a better platform and it is already lighter but for an all around car i picked the camaro.
It's kind of hard to compare a 5.7L+ 2v pushrod engine to a 4.6L OHC 3v motor. The bolt on 3v's don't do too badly though, 11's is pretty fast considering.
YouTube - Na S197 (Matt Da Silva- 11.89@11
YouTube - "B.O.B." (Bolt On BadAZZ) RUNS 11s!
YouTube - Adam's 2010
__________________
