TT346 LS1 goes 8.5 @ 162 with stock crank,stock block, stock head castings
This arguing between Al and Scott makes my damn head hurt. The only redeming thing about it is that it will make for some great grudge racing in a few weeks.
__________________
98 Z28 A4/LS1
Sport Gold Metalic
God I Hate Ricers
98 Z28 A4/LS1
Sport Gold Metalic
God I Hate Ricers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by HybridSS
Psst...Scott...havent you had your car for 14 years????
And check out the below qoutes...which is it...450..500...ot whichever is convienent to back your ever changing arguement. Im gonna start calling you John kerry..waffle man.
Psst...Scott...havent you had your car for 14 years????
And check out the below qoutes...which is it...450..500...ot whichever is convienent to back your ever changing arguement. Im gonna start calling you John kerry..waffle man.
Sure I have had it 14 years but any attempt to make any power and go for 10's (i.e. turbo) has been going on since this past February. On the other hand you have had a big bad 383 w/spray and been stuck in the 10's for at least 4 years.
Regardless it is still less than yours minus 82 cubic inches, built bottom end, and not proclaiming to be the nitrous god . Hell look at Dan's car before it broke, uper 600 rwhp ! :o Now that is freaking impressive.
I thought estimates, until they were actually proven were invalid in your book kind of like this statement of yours:
It should be obvious now that there is alot more to running the # than just making a the stament that "it should make xxx power and go XX.XX"
Keep em' coming big guy I have a ton more great quotes like that.
Mr. Kerry.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Gunslinger09
This arguing between Al and Scott makes my damn head hurt. The only redeming thing about it is that it will make for some great grudge racing in a few weeks.
This arguing between Al and Scott makes my damn head hurt. The only redeming thing about it is that it will make for some great grudge racing in a few weeks.
I agree, it is all quite childish I just can't stand it when people play the innocent victim angle or just can't own up to what they have said before. And any grudge racing will be towards the end of the year, as soon as I get the gearing issue resolved on my car and get some runs in it to see what the stocker can do it has to come apart and have the heads cc'd so I can order pistons for the new motor. Plus what would my itty bitty stocker have for the all out direct port monster anyway ?
I would be lying if I did not say it was somewhat amusing to watch Al get all worked up and stay up until 2:30 in the morning making replies. Al just can not stand anyone that challenges him since many just take what he says as the gospil. I need a arch nemisis to keep me motivated so Al fits the bill perfectly.
Oh well off to work, have fun Al making whitty comments I will not be back to defeat / defend them since I have grown tired of this once again. Plug your boat and spend more time getting the chebbie ruunin' so we can finally see that 9 second run after all of these years.
Originally posted by Scott
Sure I have had it 14 years but any attempt to make any power and go for 10's (i.e. turbo) has been going on since this past February. On the other hand you have had a big bad 383 w/spray and been stuck in the 10's for at least 4 years.
Regardless it is still less than yours minus 82 cubic inches, built bottom end, and not proclaiming to be the nitrous god . Hell look at Dan's car before it broke, uper 600 rwhp ! :o Now that is freaking impressive.
I thought estimates, until they were actually proven were invalid in your book kind of like this statement of yours:
Errr pot-kettle-black ?
Keep em' coming big guy I have a ton more great quotes like that.
Mr. Kerry.
Sure I have had it 14 years but any attempt to make any power and go for 10's (i.e. turbo) has been going on since this past February. On the other hand you have had a big bad 383 w/spray and been stuck in the 10's for at least 4 years.
Regardless it is still less than yours minus 82 cubic inches, built bottom end, and not proclaiming to be the nitrous god . Hell look at Dan's car before it broke, uper 600 rwhp ! :o Now that is freaking impressive.
I thought estimates, until they were actually proven were invalid in your book kind of like this statement of yours:
Errr pot-kettle-black ?
Keep em' coming big guy I have a ton more great quotes like that.
Mr. Kerry.
So in other words...you were stuck in the 12s for THIRTEEEN Years Ahahahahahahahaha!
And then you go back to the cubic in arguement.....what a freakin ricer...how pathetic.
Dans car was impressive??? well thank you...thank you very much Who do you think installed the heads, cam and setup the nitrous in dual stages. I appreciate the pat on the back from you Scott...I didnt know you had it in you
You have a ton more qoutes like that???? That qoute had nothing to do with HP estimates. It was refering to Et for a known HP and that that known HP does not translate to a given ET.
So yeah...keep em comming...with qoutes like that you may as well go randomly qoute something I wrote and then write what you want. It will make about as much sense. Jeeezus...you are an idiot
You may as well randomly pound on the keys of your keyboard like a three year old...because the shit you are typing makes about as much sense
And here is one more qoute to completely prove you are the antagonist here...let alone the fact that these threads ONLY are in ones that I post and ONLY in the GM section...this is all brought on by you.
Originally posted by Scott
I like to pick out TR users that have been a asshole to me in the past and throw bait at their hot buttons to see if they will engage in a arguement with me.
I like to pick out TR users that have been a asshole to me in the past and throw bait at their hot buttons to see if they will engage in a arguement with me.
Bottom line....dont want to look like an asshole...dont post here.
Have a nice day
__________________
if it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast, if it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable, if it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap
if it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast, if it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable, if it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap
Last edited by HybridSS; 09-29-2004 at 09:58 AM.
this shit is always fun to read.yes for a stock block,crank and head casting that is a stout number.
as for a turbo vs nos
in the long run they cost about the same amount if u are building a race engine.
as for a street engine it is cheaper to go with nitrous unless u can get a deal on a blower or turbo.because soon as u start adding more and more stages of juice it puts u up there.
but then u can factor in the cost of just going n/a and it comes out close to the cost of doing a nitrous setup.
SO IT COMES DOWN TO WHAT EVER YOUR CUP OF TEA IS!
and yes turbos are nice but i like centrifecal superchargers better.alot of them can get down tracks that turbo cars cant.
and look at the ati procharged nova that runs low 8s on 28 pounds of boost using ported gmpp heads and stock crank and block.an does it on pump gas.now thats a statement.
as for a turbo vs nos
in the long run they cost about the same amount if u are building a race engine.
as for a street engine it is cheaper to go with nitrous unless u can get a deal on a blower or turbo.because soon as u start adding more and more stages of juice it puts u up there.
but then u can factor in the cost of just going n/a and it comes out close to the cost of doing a nitrous setup.
SO IT COMES DOWN TO WHAT EVER YOUR CUP OF TEA IS!
and yes turbos are nice but i like centrifecal superchargers better.alot of them can get down tracks that turbo cars cant.
and look at the ati procharged nova that runs low 8s on 28 pounds of boost using ported gmpp heads and stock crank and block.an does it on pump gas.now thats a statement.
__________________
Its really getting old guys. Please stay on topic b4 I have to moderate...
__________________
Single Toyota Supra Auto, Twin Turbo C5 FRC, and Chevy Duramax!!
My email:
vince99frc@gmail.com
Single Toyota Supra Auto, Twin Turbo C5 FRC, and Chevy Duramax!!
My email:
vince99frc@gmail.com
Harlan is very smart, talented and most of all motivated...obviously. His is a very respectable accomplishment. I'd say his keyboard has alot of dust on it since building a car like his takes so much time and effort.......unlike the keyboards of a couple of jackoffs on this thread, who's cars have yet to become "Harlan-like".
At the end of the day (or when the dust settles back to the keyboards), I'd rather have Harlan's car.
At the end of the day (or when the dust settles back to the keyboards), I'd rather have Harlan's car.