A Night Out
JUDGE RACING
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you fucking kidding me?
Dude, you can not possibly be this retarded. They trapped 2mph faster then the AMS car that dyno'd 778whp dynojet. That means they are making approximately 20-25whp more. That puts their power just at the cusp of 800whp dynojet. Their Mustang dyno results were 816whp which is supposed to be 13% LOWER then a dynojet if setup correctly and not manipulated. All they proved was that their dyno reads HIGHER then a dynojet. This puts the dyno readings about 100whp HIGHER then they advertised their "low reading Mustang dyno" to read. Once again INFLATED DYNO NUMBERS SCAM REVEALED!!!
Considering Bradenton will only let me continue running my car there if I agree to put N/T on my window there's no error of board vs time slip. I have posted multiple 10.3 slips. Nothing to wonder.
Dude, you can not possibly be this retarded. They trapped 2mph faster then the AMS car that dyno'd 778whp dynojet. That means they are making approximately 20-25whp more. That puts their power just at the cusp of 800whp dynojet. Their Mustang dyno results were 816whp which is supposed to be 13% LOWER then a dynojet if setup correctly and not manipulated. All they proved was that their dyno reads HIGHER then a dynojet. This puts the dyno readings about 100whp HIGHER then they advertised their "low reading Mustang dyno" to read. Once again INFLATED DYNO NUMBERS SCAM REVEALED!!!Considering Bradenton will only let me continue running my car there if I agree to put N/T on my window there's no error of board vs time slip. I have posted multiple 10.3 slips. Nothing to wonder.
__________________
Stock turbo/Stock Block- 10.80@125.97mph
FP Red/Stock Block- 10.301@132.93mph
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2CqirgpFeM
Hta3582 w-.63Tial/Stock Block- 9.96@139.83mph
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxjaKUnUZNk
Tampa's Quickest Mitsubishi
JUDGE RACING
Join us on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Judge-Racing/203463879689026
Sponsored by:
MAPerformance
Stock turbo/Stock Block- 10.80@125.97mph
FP Red/Stock Block- 10.301@132.93mph
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2CqirgpFeM
Hta3582 w-.63Tial/Stock Block- 9.96@139.83mph
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxjaKUnUZNk
Tampa's Quickest Mitsubishi
JUDGE RACING
Join us on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Judge-Racing/203463879689026
Sponsored by:
MAPerformance
Last edited by ryu; 08-06-2010 at 06:23 AM.
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pump Gas Pimps
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you fucking kidding me? Dude, you can not possibly be this retarded. They trapped 2mph faster then the AMS car that dyno'd 778whp dynojet. That means they are making approximately 20-25whp more. That puts their power just at the cusp of 800whp dynojet. Their Mustang dyno results were 816whp which is supposed to be 13% LOWER then a dynojet if setup correctly and not manipulated. All they proved was that their dyno reads HIGHER then a dynojet. This puts the dyno readings about 100whp HIGHER then they advertised their "low reading Mustang dyno" to read. Once again INFLATED DYNO NUMBERS SCAM REVEALED!!!
Considering Bradenton will only let me continue running my car there if I agree to put N/T on my window there's no error of board vs time slip. I have posted multiple 10.3 slips. Nothing to wonder.
Dude, you can not possibly be this retarded. They trapped 2mph faster then the AMS car that dyno'd 778whp dynojet. That means they are making approximately 20-25whp more. That puts their power just at the cusp of 800whp dynojet. Their Mustang dyno results were 816whp which is supposed to be 13% LOWER then a dynojet if setup correctly and not manipulated. All they proved was that their dyno reads HIGHER then a dynojet. This puts the dyno readings about 100whp HIGHER then they advertised their "low reading Mustang dyno" to read. Once again INFLATED DYNO NUMBERS SCAM REVEALED!!!Considering Bradenton will only let me continue running my car there if I agree to put N/T on my window there's no error of board vs time slip. I have posted multiple 10.3 slips. Nothing to wonder.
As I said before, the car was not on 816whp... It made 880whp the night before the track with more boost. You cannot determine the HP from a trap speed unless the 60-foot times are identical. The FBI EvoX was only managing 1.7-1.8 60-foots; while AMS was doing consistant 1.5's on better tires.
When this car goes back on a DynoJet and makes 9XXwhp you're gonna look like a FUCKING IDIOT!
Last edited by 2 ROWDY; 08-06-2010 at 09:26 AM.
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If FBI's Dyno is off, then so is TTP's because Cuco's Evo dyno'd 2HP different from TTP's dyno on FBI's on the SAME DAY... So if the FBI dyno is happy - that makes all your "stock block HP records" bullshit.
As I said before, the car was not on 816whp... It made 880whp the night before the track with more boost. You cannot determine the HP from a trap speed unless the 60-foot times are identical. The FBI EvoX was only managing 1.7-1.8 60-foots; while AMS was doing consistant 1.5's on better tires.
When this car goes back on a DynoJet and makes 9XXwhp you're gonna look like a FUCKING IDIOT!
As I said before, the car was not on 816whp... It made 880whp the night before the track with more boost. You cannot determine the HP from a trap speed unless the 60-foot times are identical. The FBI EvoX was only managing 1.7-1.8 60-foots; while AMS was doing consistant 1.5's on better tires.
When this car goes back on a DynoJet and makes 9XXwhp you're gonna look like a FUCKING IDIOT!
Hope it make that 900 so your right. Just prove people wrong and they or rather we can shut up.
__________________
Tuning, Builds, Assembly, Turbo Installs, Repairs and More
inductionperformance.com
ALPHA TUNED 
Tuning, Builds, Assembly, Turbo Installs, Repairs and More
inductionperformance.com
