91 300zx puttin on 240sx Throttel body
they are an upgrade (kinda) for the 84-89 300z.
they are bigger, yes. direct bolt on? no. if you have to do this upgrade use one from a 91 stanza. same dim. and 100% bolt on except for the port matching to intake....however dyno tests have been done and it was like a .5hp increase. you might get a 'little' better throttle response, but that will be tested by the butt dyno so....
they are bigger, yes. direct bolt on? no. if you have to do this upgrade use one from a 91 stanza. same dim. and 100% bolt on except for the port matching to intake....however dyno tests have been done and it was like a .5hp increase. you might get a 'little' better throttle response, but that will be tested by the butt dyno so....
__________________
SHIFT_old school
399.5 hp 430 tq on 95k mile junkyard motor
12.0 @ 118.22 1.89 60`
DILLIGAF?
SHIFT_old school
399.5 hp 430 tq on 95k mile junkyard motor
12.0 @ 118.22 1.89 60`
DILLIGAF?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thats what most T2.3 Ford guys have found. The car feels a bunch faster, but never picks anything up on the dyno (.5HP is WELL within the margin of error of any dyno). Most say it feels so much faster because at a given throttle angle, more air is going into the motor with the bigger TB.
Of course I have a friend that feels any TB bigger than the outlet of the turbo is a waste. His Pinto runs 9's so he may know what he's talking about.
Either way, my car is just as fast at 3/4 throttle as it is at full throttle, so it must not matter much.
Of course I have a friend that feels any TB bigger than the outlet of the turbo is a waste. His Pinto runs 9's so he may know what he's talking about.
Either way, my car is just as fast at 3/4 throttle as it is at full throttle, so it must not matter much.