Photography & Graphics Got a cool photoshop? Need a signature?

It happened

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-28-2008, 02:01 PM
  #11 (permalink)  
Official Photo Ninja
 
SaturnTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DareDevil
Nice buy man Enjoy.

I believe in nicer lenses, rather than i nicer camera.

Which leads me to a thread I'm about to create.
+1 its not about the 1-2k Cam. Its about the glass
__________________

Official Photographer of Festivals of Speed St. Pete, Orlando, & Miami.

Canon 7D..Stepped up my Game
Old 05-28-2008, 03:01 PM
  #12 (permalink)  
www.CEMayhall.com
 
CEMAYHALL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SaturnTypeR
+1 its not about the 1-2k Cam. Its about the glass
Ehh... Although the glass is important it also depends on what you're shooting! ~> I would hate to go to shoot a professional Sporting Event w/ a slow camera!

Example: Rebel = 3 frames a second ~> The Rebel cant write them to the CF card that quick enough so after about 30 jpegs/ raw images, the LCD Screen will read Busy... =

You need a Nice Body and Nice Glass! ~> Hence why most of us are broke as a joke .
__________________

Old 05-28-2008, 07:12 PM
  #13 (permalink)  
Race Photographer
 
Mars_302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 42,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats a serious upgrade.
__________________
Floridaracing.org Tenative Schedulealso check out the Auto-x Event Schedule

"I am and what I do are not a taxable commodity for you to use and abuse" - Me

This is my fuck the government movement


Old 05-29-2008, 03:11 AM
  #14 (permalink)  
I'm a Photographer!
Thread Starter
 
Michael.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My glass list includes now:

Sigma 10-20
Sigma 24-70 2.8
Nikkor 50mm 1.8
Nikkor 70-300 VR

Not the "best/most professional" glass available, but with what I shoot, I cant really tell the difference between the Nikon equivalent (for instance the 24-70 2.8 Nikkor) that costs almost 3x as much. I know its in the glass but it IS in the body too. Like Chris M said, you dont want a slow camera, and I was getting ahead of the D50 by quite a bit, and since I may be shooting for my school paper now and then, having this will be awesome at a few football games and I'll borrow their 80-200 2.8
__________________
Nikon D300 | 10-20 | 18-50 2.8 | 70-300 VR | 50 1.8 | 80-200 2.8

Originally Posted by Petitt
Please take a look at our Photography section with your friend, and take some notes.
Old 05-29-2008, 09:01 AM
  #15 (permalink)  
Race Photographer
 
Mars_302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 42,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what was holding you back with the d50?
__________________
Floridaracing.org Tenative Schedulealso check out the Auto-x Event Schedule

"I am and what I do are not a taxable commodity for you to use and abuse" - Me

This is my fuck the government movement


Old 05-29-2008, 09:16 AM
  #16 (permalink)  
www.CEMayhall.com
 
CEMAYHALL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mars_302
what was holding you back with the d50?
Maybe b/c its only 2.5 Frames Per Second?
__________________

Old 05-29-2008, 09:43 AM
  #17 (permalink)  
Mofongo Expert!
 
racerraul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A fast camera sure is nice... I dealt with my 1st gen Digital Rebel (2.5FPS and even worse 4 shot buffer) for a long time... Now that I have my 30D I'm spoiled.

I agree that glass is prob the most important.... but speed would be a close 2nd IMO.
__________________
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it
Old 05-29-2008, 10:03 AM
  #18 (permalink)  
Race Photographer
 
Mars_302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 42,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Most ppl dont ever utlize highspeed shooting. In fact it can be overly used in a lot of scenarios as a bad habit, a "shoot a lot and hope something sticks" I can say that from a lot of personal expierence when it comes to shooting stuff other cars racing, its a bad habit I need to get out. 3fps is plenty for anything thats not sports.
__________________
Floridaracing.org Tenative Schedulealso check out the Auto-x Event Schedule

"I am and what I do are not a taxable commodity for you to use and abuse" - Me

This is my fuck the government movement


Old 05-29-2008, 10:28 AM
  #19 (permalink)  
Official Photo Ninja
 
SaturnTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mars_302
Most ppl dont ever utlize highspeed shooting. In fact it can be overly used in a lot of scenarios as a bad habit, a "shoot a lot and hope something sticks" I can say that from a lot of personal expierence when it comes to shooting stuff other cars racing, its a bad habit I need to get out. 3fps is plenty for anything thats not sports.
LMAO Yes.
__________________

Official Photographer of Festivals of Speed St. Pete, Orlando, & Miami.

Canon 7D..Stepped up my Game
Old 05-29-2008, 11:12 AM
  #20 (permalink)  
Post Deleting Expert.
 
.:Chris:.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, my latest camera shoots 5fps and it's really way more than I need. I used it last week in combination with bracketing to get a set of handheld images I could use for HDR. That's really the only thing I've used it for, and honestly, it isn't something I do often.
__________________



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM.