d7000 noise example at iso6400

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

01-22-2011, 01:40 PM

#1 (permalink)

StreetRacingOnline

Registered User

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2000

Posts: 1,608

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

d7000 noise example at iso6400

http://www.flickr.com/photos/powersimagery/5378499923/http://www.flickr.com/photos/powersimagery/5378499923/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/powersimagery/, on Flickr

d7000
iso6400
1/160 @ 2.8

File type: Large, Normal, JPG

noise comparison.
All Noise reduction turned off

Before:
Straight out of camera,

After:
simple LR3 noise reduction

__________________
Just a photographer with a bunch of NIKON glass.
My Twitter: http://twitter.com/powersimagery
My Blog: http://powersimagery.com/blog
My Website: www.powersimagery.com
My Job: Vegas Magazine | Retna LTD | Tao/Lavo/Marquee Las Vegas

Reply Like

01-22-2011, 05:11 PM

#2 (permalink)

Red2GDSM

In the making...

Join Date: Jun 2006

Posts: 1,057

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Hey how is that camera? Im about to buy one and just wanted to get a personal opinion.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by solsi2000

does this magical box come with a pussy magnet?

Quote:

Originally Posted by NISSAN

need to fill ur vtec fluid back up, thats why, its located in the back of the block, the little black box.

^^Lmao this shit was just funny

Reply Like

01-22-2011, 05:28 PM

#3 (permalink)

StreetRacingOnline

Registered User

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2000

Posts: 1,608

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

its very good prosumer camera that will work well in pro situations. However if you currently own a dXXX series camera and plan on using both in the field at the same time, it will get a little confusing since the controls and menus are different.

Reply Like

01-22-2011, 07:06 PM

#4 (permalink)

Jake2k

Drinker of the Dew

Join Date: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,041

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I def. wouldnt mind having this camera but I told myself that the next time I upgrade I'm going full frame lol

__________________

"Thirty-six satisfactory exposures on a roll means a
photographer is not trying anything new." - Freeman Patterson

Reply Like

01-22-2011, 11:28 PM

#5 (permalink)

StreetRacingOnline

Registered User

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2000

Posts: 1,608

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

got one of those. and waiting for the d700 successor as my next main cam.

Reply Like

01-23-2011, 03:30 AM

#6 (permalink)

Michael.

I'm a Photographer!

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 5,759

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by StreetRacingOnline

waiting for the d700 successor as my next main cam.

Exactly. Not sure why they haven't produced a D700s/x yet.

But honestly, the performance they're getting out of the smaller sensors lately, you almost don't need to go FF and have to get some new lenses.

__________________
Nikon D300 | 10-20 | 18-50 2.8 | 70-300 VR | 50 1.8 | 80-200 2.8

Quote:

Originally Posted by Petitt

Please take a look at our Photography section with your friend, and take some notes.

Reply Like

01-23-2011, 08:32 AM

#7 (permalink)

StreetRacingOnline

Registered User

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2000

Posts: 1,608

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I don't think so. The ff sensor can't be beat.

Reply Like

01-23-2011, 06:09 PM

#8 (permalink)

jriggs

is better than you™

Join Date: Jun 2005

Posts: 2,283

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by StreetRacingOnline

agreed 100% if my 300s didn't shit on me i'd never picked up the 7k. but that being said i'd get another 7k bc i don't need the speed of the 300s

also with the FF

try to take my d3s or 35mm and you'll learn what a boot feels like even if i'm in flip flops

__________________