S2k Vs Eclipse...Good Runs
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm through explaining the truth to all you guys who are in denial. I had a friend with I/H/E with a tune, on an S2K, run a 11.8s in the quarter. You people are a joke, I can't believe you know nothing about these cars. I completely understand you can make any car fast with the right amount of money. I'm just saying an S2k is far better platform than a 4G63 equipped car to modify. If you look at the whole package, the F20C is a far better engine. It has 9000rpm rev limit, 240bhp, high compression, VTEC, and is a great sounding motor. The 4G63 just has a turbo, but that doesn't make it as fast as an S2k. Power to weight ratio people. The Eclipse/Talon weighs hundreds of pounds more than the S2K. For the guy who said you can't hit 13s stock, anybody can if they can drive. The S2K is a low 13s car from the factory. If you are not trapping above or around 100mph something is very wrong with your car. There must be some reason why we see more fast boosted S2Ks than turbo Eclipses. Coincidence? I think not.
No
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm through explaining the truth to all you guys who are in denial. I had a friend with I/H/E with a tune, on an S2K, run a 11.8s in the quarter. You people are a joke, I can't believe you know nothing about these cars. I completely understand you can make any car fast with the right amount of money. I'm just saying an S2k is far better platform than a 4G63 equipped car to modify. If you look at the whole package, the F20C is a far better engine. It has 9000rpm rev limit, 240bhp, high compression, VTEC, and is a great sounding motor. The 4G63 just has a turbo, but that doesn't make it as fast as an S2k. Power to weight ratio people. The Eclipse/Talon weighs hundreds of pounds more than the S2K. For the guy who said you can't hit 13s stock, anybody can if they can drive. The S2K is a low 13s car from the factory. If you are not trapping above or around 100mph something is very wrong with your car. There must be some reason why we see more fast boosted S2Ks than turbo Eclipses. Coincidence? I think not.
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn K, You shouldnt have posted this video...But its the first time you ever got 33 replies...
__________________
Joel's Quote:
I'm not your Man
You're not my Girl
So, Technicaly I'm Not Cheatin'
Joel's Quote:I'm not your Man
You're not my Girl
So, Technicaly I'm Not Cheatin'
No Torque
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah your right ProRacer, Its crazy...All I wanted to do was post this video an hopefully get rep points or someshit, but all i got is n/a vs turbo in my thread...Its all good anyway, I'm just a car enthusiast that luvs his s2k
__________________
nah its because this troll is making stupid statements which are obviously said to get a reaction, and people take him seriously. blame him for ruining the thread.
__________________
Srqspeed.com
-Dane
98 240 w/ bolt-onsSrqspeed.com
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PSSHHH x2
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...well i guess i could say the same thing if you count the times i didnt have the waste gate hooked up, but i think i hit fuel cut before 25psi.
__________________
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch
Yea, that about sums it up...
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch
Yea, that about sums it up...
