The Video Post Check here for the latest videos!

2010 ProCharged Camaro vs GTR

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-01-2010, 01:21 PM
  #11 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
scott hutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea I highly doubt that guy has near the power that he says
Old 10-01-2010, 01:30 PM
  #12 (permalink)  
Turn 7 at Sebring
Thread Starter
 
RoadRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here is the dyno video for the Camaro.

YouTube - 900HP SUPERCHARGED & NITROUS 2010 CAMARO SS - NELSON PERFORMANCE
__________________
Patrick -
Old 10-01-2010, 02:55 PM
  #13 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
twitch579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its a heavy ass RWD boat. Just shows how there is no efficiency in american engines. Single cam technology from 50 years ago. Only reason Vettes are fast is because they dont weigh shit.

And the GTR is heavier then the Camaro. No points for sound though on the GTR.
__________________
04.5 Z33 412/412 Single Turbo. KABOOM!

New car, 2004 YJ GTO - Forged TSP LQ9 370 - Fast 102/102 - Big Cam - Fasterproms
Old 10-01-2010, 03:08 PM
  #14 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
scott hutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RoadRacer

I stand corrected! dyno queen then lol
Old 10-01-2010, 03:11 PM
  #15 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
scott hutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by twitch579
Its a heavy ass RWD boat. Just shows how there is no efficiency in american engines. Single cam technology from 50 years ago. Only reason Vettes are fast is because they dont weigh shit.

And the GTR is heavier then the Camaro. No points for sound though on the GTR.
LOL one race proves that american engines have no efficiency? That particular car runs for shit. but there are plenty of american engined cars that run a hell of alot faster with less work.
Old 10-01-2010, 03:55 PM
  #16 (permalink)  
The Integra Guru!
 
Josh.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 20,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Holy shit, I can already see where this thread is going..

They both ran damn near the same times. Who cares what it took to get there?
Old 10-01-2010, 04:28 PM
  #17 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
97Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scott hutch
LOL one race proves that american engines have no efficiency? That particular car runs for shit. but there are plenty of american engined cars that run a hell of alot faster with less work.
+1000
People are so quick to revert to ignorant general comments.
The shit i read on this forum sometimes...

He didn't even launch the car in either runs, he left off the foot brake from an idle and you can clearly see and hear he spins in both runs, it looks more like they're testing and tuning and not running a fully dialed in car.
__________________


Turdmaro is gone, boring dd Dodge for now.
Old 10-01-2010, 04:32 PM
  #18 (permalink)  
The Integra Guru!
 
Josh.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 20,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Finally, Someone who knows something.
Old 10-01-2010, 06:11 PM
  #19 (permalink)  
Got traction?
 
bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If my engine is less efficient but I get the win light who gives a shit if my domestic motor is less efficient. Sounds like a ricer excuse to me....oh wait forgot what site I was on.
__________________
98' cobra




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 AM.